I think this has probably been my worst season as well.
There have been other bad years, like 85, 86, 96 and 2007 - the four previous times we finished bottom. But they came during the Webb years, Bateson's attempt to do everything on the cheap in 96 and the Roberts disaster in 07.
This season and last season just never need have happened. The previous 4 were sort of unavoidable in a way that this season and last were not, It is unnecessary. Two years ago we had just completed our 4 play-off campaign in 5 years. There was so much to build on.
It could be that Ling's illness was the catalyst for this. Before he went sick, I imagined he would be here for years - TUFC seemed a steady ship that had recovered well after the upset Buckle's departure had caused. Two successive play-off campaigns, a new stand - there was much to be optimistic about but a number of catastrophic decisions relating to management since Ling went ill have put us where we are...
Some are much easier to point out with hindsight but in reality they shouldn't have been...
1) The club waited for far too long to see if Ling was coming back - although this was difficult because I suppose at first, they were not sure how long he would be off but I think they could have been a little more proactive at that point.
2) The appointment of Alan Knill (as a stop-gap, while Ling was off) worried me at the time, he had an awful record as a manager, but I guess the board thought that 'beggars can't be choosers' and his record for us last season was pretty unremarkable.
3) The crucial decision was getting rid of Ling. At the time, I didn't see how Ling could come back, although I felt he was unlucky to lose his job. The reasons I thought he probably couldn't come back was because so many had turned against him and it would only take a couple of bad results for people to turn against him. I didn't think he would get a fair crack of the whip and couldn't see how it would work as he would have had a fair chunk of the fanbase against him. I think, however, it was clearly the wrong decision to sack him, although amongst the loudest defenders of his from the playing staff were Mansell/Nicholson and that might tell us all we need to know.
4) No thorough recruitment process for Ling's replacement. The board - or at least someone on the board - jumped on the bandwagon that was clamouring for Knill. That should teach the board not to listen to supporters - except for me

- as what appears to have been fan-pleasing moves have cost us.
5) Appointing Knill - his previous record and his record with us, sort of spells that one out to everyone other than Stefano who chooses to look at just 5 games, of which the last 3 of that 5 produced 1 point.
6) Not getting rid of Knill early enough. Many of said it would be too late to wait until after Christmas to get rid of him. A new manager arriving in November say, would have had two months to assess the squad before the transfer window, not a matter of days.
7) Again, not undergoing a thorough recruitment process when they finally saw sense and got rid of Knill. You think they would have learnt from last time - but no, they knew who they wanted, like they, no doubt, thought they did the last time and they probably thought it would please the fans.
If Hargreaves managerial career does end up being finished before it has really started, and the club have to look for a new manager, I just hope they either identify someone who has been successful elsewhere and go for him - e.g. Steve Burr, or ask people to apply, short-list them and then interview them.
In the meantime, I wonder if there is someone who could come in and work with Hargreaves. In the way that some young managers have old heads to support them e.g. Trollope/Lawrence, Clark/McDermott.
Dave Hockaday, is someone I have mentioned previously but I think someone like him could be the ideal candidate to support Hargreaves in the Conference.