If GI fail getting the freehold...

Discuss all the latest news at Plainmoor with fellow fans.

Topic author
threelittlepiglets
On the Bench
On the Bench
Posts: 80
Joined: 26 Apr 2017, 07:55
Favourite player: Hargreaves

If GI fail getting the freehold...

Post by threelittlepiglets » 17 May 2017, 09:28

If GI do fail in getting the freehold would they want a fast exit from TUFC?

We know there are not the buyers if anything is to be taken from the most rescent sale attempt.

If as I believe GI have already had to invest to keep the club going, in addition the original loan, would they in effect allow the club to dissolve.

The problem for me is that I can't see which is best and which is worst case.

No doubt will be a shakey few months...


lucy6lucy
Player Coach
Player Coach
Posts: 1425
Joined: 13 Feb 2012, 21:13
Favourite player: Moore
Location: Wigan

Post by lucy6lucy » 17 May 2017, 11:13

Only you know the answer to this.
Lucy


SuperNickyWroe
Legend
Legend
Posts: 5835
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 22:49
Favourite player: Andy Provan
Location: Sunny Barnsley, Yorkshire

Post by SuperNickyWroe » 17 May 2017, 11:14

threelittlepiglets wrote:
17 May 2017, 09:28
If GI do fail in getting the freehold would they want a fast exit from TUFC?

We know there are not the buyers if anything is to be taken from the most rescent sale attempt.

If as I believe GI have already had to invest to keep the club going, in addition the original loan, would they in effect allow the club to dissolve.

The problem for me is that I can't see which is best and which is worst case.

No doubt will be a shakey few months...
I don't think that's correct.
The First Member of the Month
And the poster formerly known as BarnsleyGull


Image


Bomber
First Team
First Team
Posts: 106
Joined: 05 Sep 2010, 19:32
Favourite player: Kevin Hill

Post by Bomber » 17 May 2017, 11:50

threelittlepiglets wrote:
17 May 2017, 09:28
If GI do fail in getting the freehold would they want a fast exit from TUFC?

We know there are not the buyers if anything is to be taken from the most rescent sale attempt.

If as I believe GI have already had to invest to keep the club going, in addition the original loan, would they in effect allow the club to dissolve.

The problem for me is that I can't see which is best and which is worst case.

No doubt will be a shakey few months...
They could allow the club to slide towards Administration rather than dissolve in the first instance, but that would mean they would be forced to accept in the region of 10p in the pound or less for their original investment.

I would imagine that they would want to recoup as much of their original investment as possible, I'm not sure how realistic that would be though.


Fonda
Player Coach
Player Coach
Posts: 1836
Joined: 05 Sep 2010, 19:20
Favourite player: Super Jason Fowler
Location: At work or on the sofa

Post by Fonda » 17 May 2017, 12:04

I've no idea who you are, but if (as has been insinuated by others) you are in some way involved with the chancers in charge of the club, that sounds an awful lot like a veiled threat?

For what it's worth, I'd rather the club was dissolved and start again 10 levels below where it currently is than let a prospector use it as a vehicle for his own gain. Just my opinion though.
"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something."

User avatar

Southampton Gull
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6713
Joined: 05 Sep 2010, 01:35
Favourite player: Brett Williams
Location: Southampton

Post by Southampton Gull » 17 May 2017, 12:06

SuperNickyWroe wrote:
17 May 2017, 11:14
threelittlepiglets wrote:
17 May 2017, 09:28
If GI do fail in getting the freehold would they want a fast exit from TUFC?

We know there are not the buyers if anything is to be taken from the most rescent sale attempt.

If as I believe GI have already had to invest to keep the club going, in addition the original loan, would they in effect allow the club to dissolve.

The problem for me is that I can't see which is best and which is worst case.

No doubt will be a shakey few months...
I don't think that's correct.
I know it isn't ;)
Dave




Friend of TorquayFans.com

User avatar

Southampton Gull
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6713
Joined: 05 Sep 2010, 01:35
Favourite player: Brett Williams
Location: Southampton

Post by Southampton Gull » 17 May 2017, 12:07

Fonda wrote:
17 May 2017, 12:04
I've no idea who you are, but if (as has been insinuated by others) you are in some way involved with the chancers in charge of the club, that sounds an awful lot like a veiled threat?

For what it's worth, I'd rather the club was dissolved and start again 10 levels below where it currently is than let a prospector use it as a vehicle for his own gain. Just my opinion though.
Not just yours mate!
Dave




Friend of TorquayFans.com


Plainmoor78
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 366
Joined: 25 Apr 2016, 11:54
Favourite player: Les Lawrence

Post by Plainmoor78 » 17 May 2017, 12:27

The important thing to realise is this. If GI fail to get the freehold of plainmoor then there is still somewhere for a football team representing the town of Torquay to play.
It doesn't matter if it is TUFC or a reincarnation, the fact is we will still have a football ground. If we fail to protect the ground then I cannot see professional football ever returning to the bay.
As for a new stadium, I honestly do not think that will ever happen; anyway there is nothing wrong with plainmoor that couldn't be fixed with a bit of imaginative business know how.


Fonda
Player Coach
Player Coach
Posts: 1836
Joined: 05 Sep 2010, 19:20
Favourite player: Super Jason Fowler
Location: At work or on the sofa

Post by Fonda » 17 May 2017, 12:33

Southampton Gull wrote:
17 May 2017, 12:07
Fonda wrote:
17 May 2017, 12:04
I've no idea who you are, but if (as has been insinuated by others) you are in some way involved with the chancers in charge of the club, that sounds an awful lot like a veiled threat?

For what it's worth, I'd rather the club was dissolved and start again 10 levels below where it currently is than let a prospector use it as a vehicle for his own gain. Just my opinion though.
Not just yours mate!
:cool: We've always agreed on everything Dave!
"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something."


merse btpir
Team Captain
Team Captain
Posts: 509
Joined: 02 Jan 2017, 10:58
Favourite player: robin stubbs

Post by merse btpir » 17 May 2017, 13:31

.......and so the predictable spectre of blackmail and threat come to play. Didn't take long did it!

What's the next one threelittlepiglets ~ the knock on the door? :|


ACW2IOW
Youth Team
Youth Team
Posts: 5
Joined: 19 Dec 2016, 01:19
Favourite player: Mark Ellis

Post by ACW2IOW » 17 May 2017, 13:47

It would appear that Osborne and Masters could well now be going their separate ways!

White Tigers’ Chairman, Peter Masters, and Torquay United owner, Clarke Osborne, have also been in talks.
“Both Truro and Torquay can have certainty about plans going forward,” admitted Mr. Masters. “There is no longer any chance of Truro City sharing with Torquay United.
“All the talks have been amicable and there’s no bad feeling anywhere. We both felt it would be the best thing for both clubs.
“The National League was not keen on us ground-sharing with Torquay anyway and wanted us to find a Cornish alternative.”

User avatar

Southampton Gull
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6713
Joined: 05 Sep 2010, 01:35
Favourite player: Brett Williams
Location: Southampton

Post by Southampton Gull » 17 May 2017, 14:27

Fonda wrote:
17 May 2017, 12:33
Southampton Gull wrote:
17 May 2017, 12:07
Fonda wrote:
17 May 2017, 12:04
I've no idea who you are, but if (as has been insinuated by others) you are in some way involved with the chancers in charge of the club, that sounds an awful lot like a veiled threat?

For what it's worth, I'd rather the club was dissolved and start again 10 levels below where it currently is than let a prospector use it as a vehicle for his own gain. Just my opinion though.
Not just yours mate!
:cool: We've always agreed on everything Dave!
I'm finding it hard to post anything these days because I'm agreeing with just about everyone that I've spent years arguing with. It's just not natural ;)
Dave




Friend of TorquayFans.com


SuperNickyWroe
Legend
Legend
Posts: 5835
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 22:49
Favourite player: Andy Provan
Location: Sunny Barnsley, Yorkshire

Post by SuperNickyWroe » 17 May 2017, 15:00

Southampton Gull wrote:
17 May 2017, 14:27
Fonda wrote:
17 May 2017, 12:33
Southampton Gull wrote:
17 May 2017, 12:07


Not just yours mate!
:cool: We've always agreed on everything Dave!
I'm finding it hard to post anything these days because I'm agreeing with just about everyone that I've spent years arguing with. It's just not natural ;)
arr Dave that's so nice...... :love: :rofl:
The First Member of the Month
And the poster formerly known as BarnsleyGull


Image


Gullscorer
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6530
Joined: 22 Jul 2011, 00:30
Contact:

Post by Gullscorer » 17 May 2017, 15:33

There are two half-decent options:

First, GI could cut their losses and simply sell the club for whatever they can get for it; or

Secondly, they could give up their desire to buy the Plainmoor freehold, and concentrate on investing in (a) developing the potential at Plainmoor for increased revenue streams (and even increasing the ground capacity), and (b) the playing staff and the team, to get it moving into the Football League and eventually establishing it in League One. Once this is achieved, it may not be necessary to acquire Plainmoor's freehold in order to obtain funding for a new stadium; better to buy the ground for the new stadium at an appropriate time. Obviously this would be a long-term approach where the focus of a five-year plan would be shifted more towards the football and Plainmoor's potential (which has been neglected in recent years), but that would be no bad thing. Thereafter, a new stadium, increased revenues, and (why not) Championship football !


Fonda
Player Coach
Player Coach
Posts: 1836
Joined: 05 Sep 2010, 19:20
Favourite player: Super Jason Fowler
Location: At work or on the sofa

Post by Fonda » 17 May 2017, 15:45

I think we can be reasonably confident that if GI aren't given the go-ahead on the ground, their next 'plan' will be an exit strategy. And any threats of what that might mean are futile - it will still be better than the club being homeless.
"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something."

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], dougie, Google Adsense [Bot], merse btpir, Plainmoor78, stephen breed, torq2u and 65 guests